BREAKING: Experts Say Running a Company Like a High Schooler’s D&D Campaign May Not Be 'Best Practice'

A recent financial analysis, penned by the esteemed 'Institute for Utterly Obvious Observations,' has delivered a truly groundbreaking conclusion: allowing the CEO to treat a multi-billion dollar aerospace venture as his personal piggy bank and/or intergalactic playground might not be optimally structured for, you know, *other* investors. Apparently, distributing shares in a manner that ensures Mr. Musk maintains an iron grip on decision-making, while everyone else gets to enjoy the thrill of watching their equity do interpretative dance, is being described as 'sub-optimal.' This revelation has sent shockwaves through the niche community of people who were under the impression that corporate governance involved anything more than a visionary’s fever dream and a healthy dose of Twitter polls. Industry insiders are now reportedly considering a bold new strategy: perhaps corporations should, at some point, benefit their actual shareholders, not just the guy who named the rockets after fictional characters. Revolutionary stuff, truly.